Requirements for student programs in the undergraduate computer science curriculum: How much is enough?

Authors:
Lionel E. Deimel, Jr.;Mark Pozefsky
Affiliations:
Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina;Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
Venue:
SIGCSE '79 Proceedings of the tenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Year:
1979

Citing 3
Cited 3

The mythical man-month (anniversary ed.)

The mythical man-month (anniversary ed.)
The TODISK-WATLOAD system: a convenient tool for evaluating student programs

ACM-SE 16 Proceedings of the 16th annual Southeast regional conference
Techniques of Program Structure and Design

Techniques of Program Structure and Design

Progressive project assignments in computer courses

SIGCSE '89 Proceedings of the twentieth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
CMS at North Carolina State University: Tailoring a time sharing system for computer science instruction

SIGCSE '82 Proceedings of the thirteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Integration of design and programming methodology into beginning computer science courses

SIGCSE '82 Proceedings of the thirteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Student-written programs accepted by computer science instructors are usually inferior to programs which exemplify currently-accepted “good” professional practice. Although enforcing more rigorous standards for programs places an additional burden on students and faculty alike, substantial benefits may be gained thereby. The natureand implementation of such standards are discussed.