Journal of the ACM (JACM)
On Limited versus Polynomial Nondeterminism
On Limited versus Polynomial Nondeterminism
Parameterized Complexity
The Complexity of Predicting Atomicity Violations
TACAS '09 Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems: Held as Part of the Joint European Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2009,
Improving exhaustive search implies superpolynomial lower bounds
Proceedings of the forty-second ACM symposium on Theory of computing
A finite state intersection approach to propositional satisfiability
Theoretical Computer Science
Implicitly intersecting weighted automata using dual decomposition
NAACL HLT '12 Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
Hi-index | 5.23 |
We consider uniform and non-uniform assumptions for the hardness of an explicit problem from finite state automata theory. First we show that a small improvement in the known straightforward algorithm for this problem can be used to design faster algorithms for subset sum and factoring, and improved deterministic simulations for non-deterministic time.On the other hand, we can use the same improved algorithm for our FSA problem to prove complexity class separation results (NL is not equal to P, or NP for the non-uniform case). This result can be viewed either as a hardness result for the FSA intersection problem, or as a method for separating NL from P or NP. It is interesting to note that this approach is based on a more general method for separating two complexity classes, using algorithms rather than lower bounds.