Representation results for defeasible logic
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL)
Executable declarative business rules and their use in electronic commerce
Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on Applied computing
Embedding Defeasible Logic into Logic Programs
ICLP '02 Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Logic Programming
Relating Defeasible Logic to Extended Logic Programs
SETN '02 Proceedings of the Second Hellenic Conference on AI: Methods and Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Relating Defeasible and Default Logic
AI '01 Proceedings of the 14th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
A Denotational Semantics of Defeasible Logic
CL '00 Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computational Logic
Revising Nonmonotonic Theories: The Case of Defeasible Logic
KI '99 Proceedings of the 23rd Annual German Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
A model-based approach to integrating security policies for embedded devices
Proceedings of the 4th ACM international conference on Embedded software
Propositional defeasible logic has linear complexity
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
Induction of defeasible logic theories in the legal domain
ICAIL '03 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Embedding defeasible logic into logic programming
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
Defeasible security policy composition for web services
Proceedings of the fourth ACM workshop on Formal methods in security
DR-Prolog: A System for Defeasible Reasoning with Rules and Ontologies on the Semantic Web
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Strategic argumentation: a game theoretical investigation
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Extracting rights and obligations from regulations: toward a tool-supported process
Proceedings of the twenty-second IEEE/ACM international conference on Automated software engineering
A system for modal and deontic defeasible reasoning
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing
Propositional Clausal Defeasible Logic
JELIA '08 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence
Visualization of Proofs in Defeasible Logic
RuleML '08 Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rule Representation, Interchange and Reasoning on the Web
Why Eliciting and Managing Legal Requirements Is Hard
RELAW '08 Proceedings of the 2008 Requirements Engineering and Law
Argumentation semantics for defeasible logics
PRICAI'00 Proceedings of the 6th Pacific Rim international conference on Artificial intelligence
An approach based on citation analysis to support effective handling of regulatory compliance
Future Generation Computer Systems
Human and unhuman commonsense reasoning
LPAR'10 Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Logic for programming, artificial intelligence, and reasoning
Monitoring conformance to the internal regulation of an MSc course using ontologies and rules
EGOVIS'11 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Electronic government and the information systems perspective
A graphical rule authoring tool for defeasible reasoning in the semantic web
PCI'05 Proceedings of the 10th Panhellenic conference on Advances in Informatics
Visualizing defeasible logic rules for the semantic web
ASWC'06 Proceedings of the First Asian conference on The Semantic Web
A visual environment for developing defeasible rule bases for the semantic web
RuleML'05 Proceedings of the First international conference on Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web
A defeasible logic for clauses
AI'11 Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Regulations are a wide-spread and important part of government and business. They codify how products must be made and processes should be performed. Such regulations can be difficult to understand and apply. In an environment of growing complexity of, and change in, regulation, automated support for reasoning with regulations is becoming increasingly necessary. In this paper we claim that such automated support can be provided on the basis of defeasible logical rules. We highlight the support that can be provided by this logical tool, and illustrate some aspects using examples from one specific domain: university regulations.