Randomized protocols for asynchronous consensus

  • Authors:
  • James Aspnes

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT

  • Venue:
  • Distributed Computing - Papers in celebration of the 20th anniversary of PODC
  • Year:
  • 2003

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The famous Fischer, Lynch, and Paterson impossibility proof shows that it is impossible to solve the consensus problem in a natural model of an asynchronous distributed system if even a single process can fail. Since its publication, two decades of work on fault-tolerant asynchronous consensus algorithms have evaded this impossibility result by using extended models that provide (a) randomization, (b) additional timing assumptions, (c) failure detectors, or (d) stronger synchronization mechanisms than are available in the basic model. Concentrating on the first of these approaches, we illustrate the history and structure of randomized asynchronous consensus protocols by giving detailed descriptions of several such protocols.