A practical nonmonotonic theory for reasoning about speech acts

  • Authors:
  • Douglas Appelt;Kurt Konolige

  • Affiliations:
  • SRI International, Menlo Park, California;SRI International, Menlo Park, California

  • Venue:
  • ACL '88 Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
  • Year:
  • 1988

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

A prerequisite to a theory of the way agents understand speech acts is a theory of how their beliefs and intentions are revised as a consequence of events. This process of attitude revision is an interesting domain for the application of nonmonotonic reasoning because speech acts have a conventional aspect that is readily represented by defaults, but that interacts with an agent's beliefs and intentions in many complex ways that may override the defaults. Perrault has developed a theory of speech acts, based on Rieter's default logic, that captures the conventional aspect; it does not, however, adequately account for certain easily observed facts about attitude revision resulting from speech acts. A natural theory of attitude revision seems to require a method of stating preferences among competing defaults. We present here a speech act theory, formalized in hierarchic autoepistemic logic (a refinement of Moore's autoepistemic logic), in which revision of both the speaker's and hearer's attitudes can be adequately described. As a collateral benefit, efficient automatic reasoning methods for the formalism exist. The theory has been implemented and is now being employed by an utterance-planning system.