Programming language issues for the 1980's: SIGPLAN '83: symposium on programming languages issues in software systems

Authors:
Lawrence A. Rowe;Peter Deutsch;Stu Feldman;Butler Lampson;Barbara Liskov;Terry Winograd
Affiliations:
U.C. Berkeley;Xerox Parc;A.T. & T. Bell Laboratories;Xerox Parc;MIT;Stanford University
Venue:
ACM SIGPLAN Notices
Year:
1984

Citing 5
Cited 2

Early experience with Mesa

Communications of the ACM
Visual abstraction in an interactive programming environment

Proceedings of the 1983 ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Programming language issues in software systems
A programming language framework for designing user interfaces

Proceedings of the 1983 ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Programming language issues in software systems
Who needs languages, and why do they need them? or no matter how high the level, it's still programming

Proceedings of the 1983 ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Programming language issues in software systems
Extensions to static scoping

Proceedings of the 1983 ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Programming language issues in software systems

Maniplicons in ThinkerToy

OOPSLA '87 Conference proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages and applications
The case for simplified languages

ACM SIGPLAN Notices

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

At the SIGPLAN '83 conference, a panel discussion was held to discuss what the important programming language issues might be in the 1980's. This paper is an edited transcript of the discussion.I want to thank John White, General Chairman for the conference, who suggested that we have the panel and Richard Probst and Tim Learmont from U.C. Berkeley who recorded and transcribed the discussion. In the transcript below we have identified the speakers where possible. We apologize to those members of the audience whose comments are included below but who are not identified because we did not know their name.