Usability inspection methods
Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems
Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems
Assets '00 Proceedings of the fourth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies
Making the computer accessible to mentally retarded adults
Communications of the ACM - Supporting community and building social capital
A Practical Guide to Usability Testing
A Practical Guide to Usability Testing
Information technology for cognitive support
The human-computer interaction handbook
Making the Internet accessible for people with cognitive and communication Impairments
Universal Access in the Information Society
Indoor wayfinding:: developing a functional interface for individuals with cognitive impairments
Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
Attention and learning in the connected classroom
Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
User testing when test tasks are not appropriate
European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics: Designing beyond the Product --- Understanding Activity and User Experience in Ubiquitous Environments
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
UMAP'11 Proceedings of the 19th international conference on User modeling, adaption, and personalization
Usability evaluation for 'Komputer Saya': multimedia courseware for slow learners
IVIC'11 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Visual informatics: sustaining research and innovations - Volume Part II
SymbolChat: A flexible picture-based communication platform for users with intellectual disabilities
Interacting with Computers
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
People with cognitive disabilities benefit from new computerized tools for maintaining social contacts. Their need for easy-to-use applications has been established. However, there is little research on improving usability evaluation methods with this user group. We conducted a case study with a group of users with cognitive disabilities. Pilot test findings indicated that a think aloud test would not work well with this user group. Therefore, instead of a conventional usability test, we conducted an informal walkthrough, in addition to classroom observation and interviews. Our study shows a need to collect data with several complementary methods, and to adjust the methods to suit the characteristics of the participants. Without observational methods, many usability problems would have been missed. Furthermore, the special characteristics of this user group have to be taken into account also in expert evaluation.