Bias properties of budget constrained simulations
Operations Research
Analysis of parallel replicated simulations under a completion time constraint
ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS)
Analysis if initial transient deletion for parallel steady-state simulations
SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing
Evaluation of tests for initial-condition bias
WSC '92 Proceedings of the 24th conference on Winter simulation
Some new results on the initial transient problem
WSC '95 Proceedings of the 27th conference on Winter simulation
Regenerative steady-state simulation of discrete-event systems
ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS)
A comparison of five steady-state truncation heuristics for simulation
Proceedings of the 32nd conference on Winter simulation
On the theoretical comparison of low-bias steady-state estimators
ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS)
A new approach for parallel steady-state simulations
Proceedings of the 38th conference on Winter simulation
New estimators for parallel steady-state simulations
Winter Simulation Conference
Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference
A regenerative bootstrap approach to estimating the initial transient
Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference
Hi-index | 0.00 |
When simulating a stochastic system, simulationists often are interested in estimating various steady-state performance measures. The classical point estimator for such a measure involves simply taking the time average of an appropriate function of the process being simulated. Since the simulation can not be initiated with the (unknown) steady-state distribution, the classical point estimator is generally biased. In the context of regenerative steady-state simulation, a variety of other point estimators have been developed in an attempt to minimize the bias. In this paper, we provide an empirical comparison of these estimators in the context of four different continuous-time Markov chain models. The bias of the point estimators and the coverage probabilities of the associated confidence intervals are reported for the four models. Conclusions are drawn from this experimental work as to which methods are most effective in reducing bias.