ISMAR '05 Proceedings of the 4th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality
A collaborative guidance case study
AUIC '08 Proceedings of the ninth conference on Australasian user interface - Volume 76
ISMAR '06 Proceedings of the 5th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality
Parallel Tracking and Mapping for Small AR Workspaces
ISMAR '07 Proceedings of the 2007 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality
On the choice and placement of wearable vision sensors
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans
Augmented reality system for visualizing 3-D region of interest in unknown environment
ACCV'10 Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on Computer vision - Volume part II
Remote assistance using visual prompts for demented elderly in cooking
Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies
Integrating the physical environment into mobile remote collaboration
MobileHCI '12 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services
TeleTorchlight: remote pointing and annotation using a mobile camera projector
MobileHCI '12 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services companion
SEMarbeta: mobile sketch-gesture-video remote support for car drivers
Proceedings of the 4th Augmented Human International Conference
Shape recognition of laser beam trace for human-robot interface
Pattern Recognition Letters
Hi-index | 0.01 |
The Wearable Active Camera/Laser (WACL) allows the remote collaborators not only to independently set their viewpoints into the wearer's workplace but also to point to real objects directly with the laser spot. In this paper, we report an user test to examine the advantages and limitations of the WACL interface in remote collaboration by comparing a head-mounted display and a head-mounted camera-based headset interface. Results show that the WACL is more comfortable to wear, is more eye-friendly, and causes less fatigue to the wearer, although there is no significant difference in task completion time. We first review related works and user studies with wearable collaborative systems, and then describe the details on the user test.