Can the field of MIS be disciplined?
Communications of the ACM
A review of MIS research and disciplinary development
Journal of Management Information Systems
The qualitative difference in information systems research and practice
Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 international conference on Information systems and qualitative research
The state of the information systems field
Communications of the AIS
Management Information Systems
Management Information Systems
The Philosophy of Critical Realism—An Opportunity for Information Systems Research
Information Systems Frontiers
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal - Issues of context in information retrieval
Information Systems an Emerging Discipline
Information Systems an Emerging Discipline
Information systems as a reference discipline
MIS Quarterly
Information systems management: The need for a post-modern approach
International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals
SAICSIT '05 Proceedings of the 2005 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In response to the South African Journal of Computing's editorial of June 2003, this paper reviews some of the philosophical issues underpinning academic research in Information Systems (IS). This is a reflective or theoretical paper, which considers a number of research paradigms and traditions and explores the relevance of Critical Realism as an appropriate metatheory for IS Research. This is not intended to be in any way a definitive description of these research traditions. Rather it is hoped that the paper will stimulate a discussion about the use of three different paradigms, and in doing so respond to the call for IS researchers to be more aware of the research methodological options available to them. The paper concludes by proposing that Critical Realism adds to the bouquet of philosophical choices available to the IS researcher, and that it is found to be an appropriate approach that transcends the critiques of both positivism and interpretivism.