Electronic meeting system experience at IBM
Journal of Management Information Systems - Special issue: Decision support and knowledge-based systems
A citation analysis of business computing research journals
Information and Management
Forums for management information systems scholars
Communications of the ACM
Forums for information systems scholars: III
Information and Management
Group Support Systems: New Perspectives
Group Support Systems: New Perspectives
Effects of Group Support Systems and Content Facilitation on Knowledge Acquisition
Journal of Management Information Systems
Improving group decision making: a fuzzy GSS approach
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews
Group decision support system for assessment of problem-basedlearning
IEEE Transactions on Education
Fuzzy set approach to the assessment of student-centered learning
IEEE Transactions on Education
DSS development and applications in China
Decision Support Systems
Variable precision rough set for group decision-making: An application
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
ICT-mediated synchronous communication in creative teamwork: from cognitive dust to semantics
HCI'07 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human-computer interaction: applications and services
An integrated method for collaborative R&D project selection: Supporting innovative research teams
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Prototype system for pursuing firm's core capability
Information Systems Frontiers
A social network-empowered research analytics framework for project selection
Decision Support Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
One of the most important decisions made in academic institutions, research organizations, and government agencies is the grading or ranking of journals for their academic values. Current methods for evaluating journals use either a subjective (e.g., experts' judgments on journals) or objective approach (e.g., impact factors of journals), or an informal mix of the two. This paper presents a formal procedure that integrates objective and subjective judgments to provide a comprehensive method. The procedure is based on a fuzzy set approach that deals with the imprecise and missing information inherent in the evaluation process. The system was tested in Hong Kong in an assessment of faculty research productivity. Similar assessments exist in the UK, Singapore, and other countries. The proposed model can also be used for similar decisions that involve subjective and objective information.