Fast text searching: allowing errors
Communications of the ACM
Towards the digital music library: tune retrieval from acoustic input
Proceedings of the first ACM international conference on Digital libraries
Towards a digital library of popular music
Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Digital libraries
Melodic matching techniques for large music databases
MULTIMEDIA '99 Proceedings of the seventh ACM international conference on Multimedia (Part 1)
Managing gigabytes (2nd ed.): compressing and indexing documents and images
Managing gigabytes (2nd ed.): compressing and indexing documents and images
Greenstone: a comprehensive open-source digital library software system
DL '00 Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries
Greenstone: Open-source DL software
Communications of the ACM
A Corpus for the Evaluation of Lossless Compression Algorithms
DCC '97 Proceedings of the Conference on Data Compression
An Asian digital libraries perspective
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal - Special issue: An Asian digital libraries perspective
Graphic designers' quest for the right music
Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter's international conference on Computer-human interaction: design centered HCI
Efficient geometric measure of music similarity
Information Processing Letters
Melodic similarity through shape similarity
CMMR'10 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Exploring music contents
Hi-index | 0.00 |
There has been a recent explosion of interest in digital music libraries. In particular, interactive melody retrieval is a striking example of a search paradigm that differs radically from the standard full-text search. Many different techniques have been proposed for melody matching, but the area lacks standard databases that allow them to be compared on common grounds--and copyright issues have stymied attempts to develop such a corpus. This paper focuses on methods for evaluating different symbolic music matching strategies, and describes a series of experiments that compare and contrast results obtained using three dominant paradigms. Combining two of these paradigms yields a hybrid approach which is shown to have the best overall combination of efficiency and effectiveness.