In-person grading: an evaluative experiment

Authors:
J. Philip East;J. Ben Schafer
Affiliations:
University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA;University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA
Venue:
Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Year:
2005

Citing 5
Cited 0

The reliability of analytic and holistic methods in rating students' computer programs

SIGCSE '88 Proceedings of the nineteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Application-based modules using apprentice learning for CS 2

SIGCSE '97 Proceedings of the twenty-eighth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Large introductory computer science classes: strategies for effective course management

SIGCSE '98 Proceedings of the twenty-ninth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Oh! Pascal!

Oh! Pascal!
Interactive program demonstration as a form of student program assessment

Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss in-person or face-to-face grading: what it is, a rationale for its use, our use of it, and an experiment we conducted to evaluate its use. While no statistically significant differences in instructional outcome effects were found, several interesting affective results were seen. Additionally, a number of research methodological suggestions arose from the study.