Theory based explanation of case law domains: 38
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
A Denotational Semantics for Deliberation Dialogues
AAMAS '04 Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1
Developing legal knowledge based systems through theory construction
ICAIL '03 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Arguing about cases as practical reasoning
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Dialogues about the burden of proof
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Argumentation in AI and law: editors' introduction
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law
Legal case-based reasoning as practical reasoning
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law
PARMENIDES: facilitating deliberation in democracies
Artificial Intelligence and Law - AI & law in eGovernment and eDemocracy part I
Extractive summarisation of legal texts
Artificial Intelligence and Law - AI & law in eGovernment and eDemocracy part I
Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology - Marco Somalvico Memorial Issue
Pierson vs. Post RevisitedA Reconstruction using the Carneades Argumentation Framework
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
Argument Schemes for Legal Case-based Reasoning
Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference
Logic for Reasoning about Components of Persuasive Actions
ISMIS '09 Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Foundations of Intelligent Systems
A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action
ArgMAS'04 Proceedings of the First international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
A denotational semantics for deliberation dialogues
ArgMAS'04 Proceedings of the First international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Locutions for argumentation in agent interaction protocols
AC'04 Proceedings of the 2004 international conference on Agent Communication
Achieving competence by argumentation on rules for roles
ESAW'04 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Engineering Societies in the Agents World
Using Argumentation Schemes for Argument Extraction: A Bottom-Up Method
International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence
Using Argumentation Schemes for Argument Extraction: A Bottom-Up Method
International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence
Using event progression to enhance purposive argumentation in the value judgment formalism
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper we attempt to give an account of reasoning with legal cases contextualised within a general theory of persuasion in practical reasoning. We begin by presenting our general theory, concentrating on the variety of ways in which a particular position can be attacked. We then apply our theory to the legal domain, illustrating our approach by a case study based on the well known CATO system. From this we conclude that it is possible to see reasoning with legal cases as a particular instantiation of our general theory. We identify some points of interest for discussion, and conclude by stating our intended directions for future work.