A non-projective dependency parser
ANLC '97 Proceedings of the fifth conference on Applied natural language processing
AAAI'96 Proceedings of the thirteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
International standard for a linguistic annotation framework
Natural Language Engineering
The TELRI tool catalogue: structure and prospects
STAR '01 Proceedings of the ACL 2001 Workshop on Sharing Tools and Resources - Volume 15
Constructing of a large-scale Chinese-English parallel corpus
COLING '02 Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on Asian language resources and international standardization - Volume 12
WHAT: an XSLT-based infrastructure for the integration of natural language processing components
SEALTS '03 Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 2003 workshop on Software engineering and architecture of language technology systems - Volume 8
International standard for a linguistic annotation framework
SEALTS '03 Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 2003 workshop on Software engineering and architecture of language technology systems - Volume 8
Outline of the international standard linguistic annotation framework
LingAnnot ;03 Proceedings of the ACL 2003 workshop on Linguistic annotation: getting the model right - Volume 19
From concrete to virtual annotation mark-up language: the case of COMMOn-REFs
LingAnnot ;03 Proceedings of the ACL 2003 workshop on Linguistic annotation: getting the model right - Volume 19
Putting FrameNet data into the ISO linguistic annotation framework
LingAnnot ;03 Proceedings of the ACL 2003 workshop on Linguistic annotation: getting the model right - Volume 19
Adaptive information extraction from unstructured documents
International Journal of Intelligent Information and Database Systems
Towards a framework for evaluating syntactic parsers
FinTAL'06 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Advances in Natural Language Processing
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
It is widely recognized that the proliferation of annotation schemes runs counter to the need to re-use language resources, and that standards for linguistic annotation are becoming increasingly mandatory. To answer this need, we have developed a representation framework comprised of an abstract model for a variety of different annotation types (e.g., morpho-syntactic tagging, syntactic annotation, co-reference annotation, etc.), which can be instantiated in different ways depending on the annotator s approach and goals. In this paper we provide an overview of our representation framework and demonstrate its applicability to syntactic annotation. We show how the framework can contribute to comparative evaluation and merging of parser output and diverse syntactic annotation schemes.