Argumentation-based negotiation
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Argument-based negotiation in a social context
Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action
ArgMAS'04 Proceedings of the First international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
ArgMAS'04 Proceedings of the First international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Argument-based negotiation in a social context
Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Managing social influences through argumentation-based negotiation
AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Enacting protocols by commitment concession
Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Dialogue games that agents play within a society
Artificial Intelligence
Interest based negotiation automation
ICIC'06 Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Computational Intelligence and Bioinformatics - Volume Part III
Realizing argumentation in multi-agent systems using defeasible logic programming
ArgMAS'09 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
A survey of flexible agent interaction approaches
Multiagent and Grid Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Autonomous agents usually operate as a multi-agent community performing actions within a shared social context to achieve their individual and collective objectives. In such a social context, their actions are influenced via two broad forms of motivations. First, the internal influences reflect the intrinsic motivations that drive the individual agent to achieve its own internal objectives. Second, as agents reside and operate within a social community, the social context itself influences their actions. Here, we categorise these latter forms as social influences. Now, in many cases, both these forms of influence may be present and they may give conflicting motivations to the individual agent. For instance, an agent may be internally motivated to perform a specific action, whereas, at the same time, it may also be subject to an external social influence not to perform it. Furthermore, agents usually have to perform their actions in environments with incomplete information. Thus, for instance, they may not be aware of the existence of all the social influences that could or indeed should affect their actions.