Value-based quality processes and results

Authors:
Barry Boehm
Affiliations:
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Venue:
3-WoSQ Proceedings of the third workshop on Software quality
Year:
2005

Citing 10
Cited 0

Software Inspection

Software Inspection
Using the WinWin Spiral Model: A Case Study

Computer
Comparing Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspections: A Replicated Experiment

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
What We Have Learned About Fighting Defects

METRICS '02 Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Software Metrics
Prioritized Use Cases as a Vehicle for Software Inspections

IEEE Software
Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed

Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed
Empirical Methods and Studies in Software Engineering: Experiences from Esernet

Empirical Methods and Studies in Software Engineering: Experiences from Esernet
Investigating the Active Guidance Factor in Reading Techniques for Defect Detection

ISESE '04 Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering
A Case Study of Reading Techniques in a Software Company

ISESE '04 Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering
Comparing Code Reading Techniques Applied to Object-Oriented Software Frameworks with Regard to Effectiveness and Defect Detection Rate

ISESE '04 Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Cost effectiveness is one of the important issues for developing products in a life cycle. And review is a key activity that can detect defects from the early stage and fix them. This paper provides Value-based review techniques adding cost effectiveness into review processes and reports on an experiment on Value-based review. Through the experiment, the Value-based review is shown to have higher cost effectiveness in review processes.