ER '07 Tutorials, posters, panels and industrial contributions at the 26th international conference on Conceptual modeling - Volume 83
Attributed Goal-Oriented Analysis Method for Selecting Alternatives of Software Requirements
IEICE - Transactions on Information and Systems
Extracting conceptual graphs from Japanese documents for software requirements modeling
APCCM '09 Proceedings of the Sixth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modeling - Volume 96
Visualizing stakeholder concerns with anchored map
HI'11 Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on Human interface and the management of information - Volume Part I
Applying collaborative process design to user requirements elicitation: A case study
Computers in Industry
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper introduces a technique to identify requirements discordances among stakeholders. This technique is validated in experiments. An extended version of the goal-oriented requirements elicitation method, named attributed goal-oriented analysis (AGORA), and its supporting tool are used. Two types of requirements discordances among stakeholders are defined: the first arises from the different interpretations by the stakeholders and the second is the result of different evaluations of preferences. Discordances are detected by the preference matrices in AGORA. Each preference matrix represents both preferences of each stakeholder and the estimated preferences of other stakeholders. A supporting tool for the AGORA method was developed. This tool is a groupware that seamlessly combines face-to-face meetings for goal elicitation and distributed individual sessions for scoring preference values. The experimental results showed that the proposed classification of discordances was sound and that the occurrences of the requirements discordances could be detected by preference matrices.