Leveraging epistemological diversity through computer-based argumentation in the domain of probability

  • Authors:
  • Dor Abrahamson;Matthew W. Berland;R. Benjamin Shapiro;Joshua W. Unterman;Uri J. Wilensky

  • Affiliations:
  • Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Evanston, IL;Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Evanston, IL;Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Evanston, IL;Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Evanston, IL;Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Evanston, IL

  • Venue:
  • ICLS '04 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Learning sciences
  • Year:
  • 2004

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The paper is a case study of technology-facilitated argumentation. Several graduate students, the first four authors, present and negotiate complementary interpretations of a diagram generated in a computer-simulated stochastic experiment. Individuals use informal visual metaphors, programming, and formal mathematical analysis to ground the diagram, i.e., to achieve a sense of proof, connection, and understanding. The NetLogo modeling-and-simulation environment (Wilensky, 1999) serves to structure the authors' grounding, appropriating, and presenting of a complex mathematical construct. We demonstrate individuals' implicitly diverse explanatory mechanisms for a shared experience. We show that this epistemological diversity, sometimes thought to undermine learning experiences, can, given appropriate learning environments and technological fluency, foster deeper understanding of mathematics and science.