Insights into the emergence of convergence in group discussions

  • Authors:
  • Manu Kapur;John Voiklis;Charles K. Kinzer;John Black

  • Affiliations:
  • National Institute of Education, Singapore;Columbia University, New York, NY;Columbia University, New York, NY;Columbia University, New York, NY

  • Venue:
  • ICLS '06 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences
  • Year:
  • 2006

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Understanding how complex group discussions converge presents a major challenge for collaborative problem-solving research (Fischer & Mandl, 2005). From a complex systems perspective, convergence in group discussions is an emergent behavior arising from the transactional interactions between group members. Leveraging on the concepts of emergent simplicity and emergent complexity (Bar-Yam, 2003), a set of theoretically-sound yet simple rules was hypothesized: Interactions between group members were conceptualized as goal-seeking adaptations that either help the group move towards or away from its goal, or maintain its status quo. Operationalizing this movement as a Markov walk, we present quantitative and qualitative findings from a study of online problem-solving groups. Findings suggest high (low) quality contributions have a greater positive (negative) impact on convergence when they come earlier in a discussion than later. Significantly, convergence analysis was able to predict a group's performance based on what happened in the first 30--40% of its discussion.