Unified theories of cognition
Integrating models of personality and emotions into lifelike characters
Affective interactions
Lifelike pedagogical agents and affective computing: an exploratory synthesis
Artificial intelligence today
Why and how CARPE should be personal?
CARPE '05 Proceedings of the 2nd ACM workshop on Continuous archival and retrieval of personal experiences
Low intensity conflicts modeling framework based on dynamic hierarchical structure DEVS approach
Proceedings of the 2007 Summer Computer Simulation Conference
Experimental study on fighters behaviors mining
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
| Hi-index | 0.01 |
The human behavior modeling community has traditionally been divided into those addressing individual behavior models, and those addressing organizational and team models. And yet it is clear that these extremes do not reflect the complex reality of the mutually-constraining interactions between an individual and his/her organizational environment. In this paper we argue that realistic models of organizations may require not only models of individual decision-makers, but also explicit models of a variety of individual differences influencing their decision-making and behavior (e.g., cognitive styles, personality traits, and affective states). Following a brief review of individual differences and cognitive architectures research, we describe two alternative approaches to modeling the individual within an organizational simulation: a cognitive architecture and a profile-based social network. We illustrate each approach with concrete examples from existing prototypes.