ACM SIGMOD Record
The myth of the double-blind review?: author identification using only citations
ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter
Impact of double-blind reviewing on SIGMOD publication rates
ACM SIGMOD Record
Editorial: Single- versus double-blind reviewing
ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS)
Using peer-evaluation in a website design course
Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
Frequently-asked questions about double-blind reviewing
ACM SIGMOD Record
Reviewing the SIGCSE reviewing process
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
Open issues in organizing computer systems conferences
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
Before and after WOWCS: a literature survey, a list of papers we wish had been submitted
WOWCS'08 Proceedings of the conference on Organizing Workshops, Conferences, and Symposia for Computer Systems
Double-blind reviewing: more placebo than miracle cure?
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
P3ERS: Privacy-Preserving PEer Review System
Transactions on Data Privacy
POPL'12 program chair's report: (or, how to run a medium-sized conference)
ACM SIGPLAN Notices - Supplemental issue
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The peer review process is generally acknowledged as central to the advancement of scholarly knowledge. It is also vital to the advancement of individual careers.