On the relative importance of privacy guidelines for ambient health care

Authors:
Evelien van de Garde-Perik;Panos Markopoulos;Boris de Ruyter
Affiliations:
Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands;Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands;Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Venue:
Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles
Year:
2006

Citing 5
Cited 2

Privacy by Design - Principles of Privacy-Aware Ubiquitous Systems

UbiComp '01 Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Ubiquitous Computing
Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation

Organization Science
Privacy risk models for designing privacy-sensitive ubiquitous computing systems

DIS '04 Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques
Privacy and proportionality: adapting legal evaluation techniques to inform design in ubiquitous computing

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Editorial: why HCI research in privacy and security is critical now

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies - Special isssue: HCI research in privacy and security is critical now

Ubiquitous Computing

Social Science Computer Review
Understanding compliance to privacy guidelines using text-and video-based scenarios

INTERACT'07 Proceedings of the 11th IFIP TC 13 international conference on Human-computer interaction - Volume Part II

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We present an empirical study regarding the relative importance of complying with privacy related guidelines in the context of a Health Monitoring System. Participants were confronted with text scenarios describing privacy related aspects of a health monitoring service for daily use at home. Participants assessed the relative importance to them of simplified variants of the OECD (Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development) guidelines for the protection of personal data. The guidelines that relate to Insight and Openness were most valued. The guidelines relating to Modification and Data Quality were valued least by most participants in this context. Methodological challenges were encountered on the way, which reveal the complexity of conducting empirical investigations of privacy aspects of human-computer interaction.