Robust reasoning: integrating rule-based and similarity-based reasoning
Artificial Intelligence
Learning, action and consciousness: a hybrid approach toward modelling consciousness
Neural Networks - 1997 special issue on neural networks for consciousness
The Architecture of Cognition
Autonomous learning of sequential tasks: experiments and analyses
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
The importance of cognitive architectures: an analysis based on CLARION
Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence
Belief revision with reinforcement learning for interactive object recognition
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on ECAI 2008: 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence
ICANN'10 Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Artificial neural networks: Part II
Theoretical status of computational cognitive modeling
Cognitive Systems Research
Hi-index | 0.00 |
To further explore the interaction between the implicit and explicit learning processes in skill acquisition (which have been tackled before, e.g. in [Sun, R., Merrill, E., & Peterson, T. (2001). From implicit skill to explicit knowledge: A bottom-up model of skill learning. Cognitive Science, 25(2), 203-244; Sun, R., Slusarz, P., & Terry, C. (2005). The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: A dual-process approach. Psychological Review, 112(1), 159-192]), this paper explores details of the interaction of different learning modes: implicit learning, explicit hypothesis testing learning, and implicit-to-explicit knowledge extraction. Contrary to the common tendency in the literature to study each type of learning in isolation, this paper highlights the interaction among them and various effects of the interaction on learning, including the synergy effect. This work advocates an integrated model of skill learning that takes into account both implicit and explicit learning processes; moreover, it also uniquely embodies a bottom-up (implicit-to-explicit) learning approach in addition to other types of learning. The paper shows that this model accounts for various effects in the human behavioural data from the psychological experiments with the process control task, in addition to accounting for other data in other psychological experiments (which has been reported elsewhere). The paper shows that to account for these effects, implicit learning, bottom-up implicit-to-explicit extraction and explicit hypothesis testing learning are all needed.