The complexity of facets resolved
Journal of Computer and System Sciences - 26th IEEE Conference on Foundations of Computer Science, October 21-23, 1985
On the complexity of dualization of monotone disjunctive normal forms
Journal of Algorithms
A Computing Procedure for Quantification Theory
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
A machine program for theorem-proving
Communications of the ACM
A deterministic (2 - 2/(k+ 1))n algorithm for k-SAT based on local search
Theoretical Computer Science
Complexity of Finding Short Resolution Proofs
MFCS '97 Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science
A Probabilistic 3-SAT Algorithm Further Improved
STACS '02 Proceedings of the 19th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science
An Improved Exponential-Time Algorithm for k-SAT
FOCS '98 Proceedings of the 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
A Probabilistic Algorithm for k-SAT and Constraint Satisfaction Problems
FOCS '99 Proceedings of the 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Improved upper bounds for 3-SAT
SODA '04 Proceedings of the fifteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The following problem is considered: given a Boolean formula f, generate another formula g such that: (i) If f is unsatisfiable then g is also unsatisfiable. (ii) If f is satisfiable then g is also satisfiable and furthermore g is "easier" than f. For the measure of this easiness, we use the density, of a formula f which is defined as (the number of satisfying assignments)/2n, where n is the number of Boolean variables of f. In this paper, we mainly consider the case that the input formula f is given as a 3-CNF formula and the output formula g may be any formula using Boolean AND, OR and negation. Two different approaches to this problem are presented: one is to obtain g by reducing the number of variables and the other by increasing the number of variables, both of which are based on existing SAT algorithms. Our performance evaluation shows that, a little surprisingly, better SAT algorithms do not always give us better density-condensation algorithms.