Journal of the American Society for Information Science
Bibliographic index coverage of a multidisciplinary field
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
An ego-centric citation analysis of the works of Michael O. Rabin based on multiple citation indexes
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal - Special issue: Informetrics
Comparison and analysis of the citedness scores in web of science and google scholar
ICADL'05 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Asian Digital Libraries: implementing strategies and sharing experiences
Finding what is missing from a digital library: A case study in the Computer Science field
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Coverage and overlap of the new social sciences and humanities journal lists
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Using the h-index to measure the quality of journals in the field of business and management
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Evaluating a department's research: Testing the Leiden methodology in business and management
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper evaluates the content of Google Scholar and seven other databases (Academic Search Elite, AgeLine, ArticleFirst, GEOBASE, POPLINE, Social Sciences Abstracts, and Social Sciences Citation Index) within the multidisciplinary subject area of later-life migration. Each database is evaluated with reference to a set of 155 core articles selected in advance-the most important studies of later-life migration published from 1990 to 2000. Of the eight databases, Google Scholar indexes the greatest number of core articles (93%) and provides the most uniform publisher and date coverage. It covers 27% more core articles than the second-ranked database (SSCI) and 2.4 times as many as the lowest-ranked database (GEOBASE). At the same time, a substantial proportion of the citations provided by Google Scholar are incomplete (32%) or presented without abstracts (33%).