Organizational Identity and Firm Performance: What Happens When Leaders Disagree About “Who We Are?”

Authors:
Zannie Giraud Voss;Daniel M. Cable;Glenn B. Voss
Affiliations:
Fuqua School of Business, Theater Studies, Duke University, Box 90680, Durham, North Carolina 27708, and Euromed Marseille School of Management;Kenan Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 3490, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3490;Department of Business Management, College of Management, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7229, 2324 Nelson Hall, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7229
Venue:
Organization Science
Year:
2006

Citing 7
Cited 0

An approach for confirmatory measurement and structural equation modeling of organizational properties

Management Science
Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes

Organization Science
Linking Organizational Values to Relationships with External Constituents: A Study of Nonprofit Professional Theatres

Organization Science
When Cymbals Become Symbols: Conflict Over Organizational Identity Within a Symphony Orchestra

Organization Science
Defining Who You Are By What You're Not: Organizational Disidentification and The National Rifle Association

Organization Science
Members' Identification with Multiple-Identity Organizations

Organization Science
Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis

Organization Science

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This study examines how the organizational success of 113 nonprofit professional theatres was affected when two top leaders responsible for different parts of the organization held divergent views about organizational identity. Focusing on five values that differentiate theatres, we find that leaders' disagreement about organizational identity was related to lower ticket revenues and lower net income, and that organizational performance was lowest when disagreement about identity was extreme. Although some findings suggest that minor identity disagreement between leaders may not hurt organizations, results generally support the perspective that leaders should actively promote a single identity.