Mailing decisions in the catalog sales industry
Management Science
Comments on the Origin and Application of Markov Decision Processes
Operations Research
Sequential cost-sensitive decision making with reinforcement learning
Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Empirical Comparison of Various Reinforcement Learning Strategies for Sequential Targeted Marketing
ICDM '02 Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
Measuring and Mitigating the Costs of Stockouts
Management Science
Bias and Variance Approximation in Value Function Estimates
Management Science
Customer Metrics and Their Impact on Financial Performance
Marketing Science
Measuring and Mitigating the Costs of Stockouts
Management Science
An Optimal Contact Model for Maximizing Online Panel Response Rates
Management Science
Dynamic Customer Management and the Value of One-to-One Marketing
Marketing Science
Reinforcement learning with a bilinear q function
EWRL'11 Proceedings of the 9th European conference on Recent Advances in Reinforcement Learning
Dynamic Capacity Allocation to Customers Who Remember Past Service
Management Science
Model selection in markovian processes
Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Computers and Industrial Engineering
| Hi-index | 0.01 |
Deciding who should receive a mail-order catalog is among the most important decisions that mail-order-catalog firms must address. In practice, the current approach to the problem is invariably myopic: firms send catalogs to customers who they think are most likely to order from that catalog. In doing so, the firms overlook the long-run implications of these decisions. For example, it may be profitable to mail to customers who are unlikely to order immediately if sending the current catalog increases the probability of a future order. We propose a model that allows firms to optimize mailing decisions by addressing the dynamic implications of their decisions. The model is conceptually simple and straightforward to implement. We apply the model to a large sample of historical data provided by a catalog firm and then evaluate its performance in a large-scale field test. The findings offer support for the proposed model but also identify opportunities for further improvement.