The Effects of New Franchisor Partnering Strategies on Franchise System Size

Authors:
Scott Shane;Venkatesh Shankar;Ashwin Aravindakshan
Affiliations:
Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, 11119 Bellflower Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44106;Mays Business School, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843;Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Venue:
Management Science
Year:
2006

Citing 6
Cited 0

Demand signalling under unobservable effort in franchising: linear and nonlinear price contracts

Management Science
The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: productivity in franchises

Management Science
Survival-Enhancing Learning in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898-1980

Management Science
New Firm Survival: Institutional Explanations for New Franchisor Mortality

Management Science
Entrepreneurs, Contracts, and the Failure of Young Firms

Management Science
An Empirical Analysis of Territorial Encroachment Within Franchised and Company-Owned Branded Chains

Marketing Science

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.01

Visualization

Abstract

Many young firms use strategic actions to attract partners who help them increase the size of their operations quickly. This article examines the use of strategic actions to attract partners and increase system size in the context of franchising. We build on research in entrepreneurship, marketing, organization theory, strategic management, and finance to develop specific hypotheses about the influences of franchisor pricing policy and strategic control decisions on system size. We test these hypotheses empirically, using panel data on a sample of 1,292 business format franchise systems from 152 industries that were established in the United States between 1979 and 1996 and followed from their inception forward in time. Our model accounts for the endogeneity of strategic decisions, controls for unobserved firm and industry factors, and accounts for selection effects due to system failure. The results show that franchisors that grow larger (1) lower royalty rates as the systems age, (2) have low up-front franchise fees that rise over time, (3) own a small proportion of outlets and lower that percentage over time, (4) keep franchisees initial investment low, and (5) finance their franchisees.