Automated antenna positioning algorithms for wireless fixed-access networks

  • Authors:
  • Yehuda Ben-Shimol;Boaz Ben-Moshe;Yoav Ben-Yehezkel;Amit Dvir;Michael Segal

  • Affiliations:
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel;College of Judea and Samaria, Ariel, Israel;Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel;Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel;Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel

  • Venue:
  • Journal of Heuristics
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This article addresses a real-life problem - obtaining communication links between multiple base station sites, by positioning a minimal set of fixed-access relay antenna sites on a given terrain. Reducing the number of relay antenna sites is considered critical due to substantial installation and maintenance costs. Despite the significant cost saved by eliminating even a single antenna site, an inefficient manual approach is employed due to the computational complexity of the problem. From the theoretical point of view we show that this problem is not only NP hard, but also does not have a constant approximation. In this paper we suggest several alternative automated heuristics, relying on terrain preprocessing to find educated potential points for positioning relay stations. A large-scale computer-based experiment consisting of approximately 7,000 different scenarios was conducted. The quality of alternative solutions was compared by isolating and displaying factors that were found to affect the standard deviation of the solutions supplied by the tested heuristics. The results of the simulation based experiments show that the saving potential increases when more base stations are needed to be interconnected. The designs of a human expert were compared to the automatically generated solutions for a small subset of the experiment scenarios. Our studies indicate that for small networks (e.g., connecting up to ten base stations), the results obtained by human experts are adequate although they rarely exceed the quality of automated alternatives. However, the process of obtaining these results in comparison to automated heuristics is longer. In addition, when more base station sites need to be interconnected, the human approach is easily outperformed by our heuristics, both in terms of better results (fewer antennas) and in significant shorter calculation times.