Experimental Extensions to RSVP - Remote Client and One-Pass Signalling
IWQoS '01 Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Quality of Service
Towards RSVP Lite: Light-Weight RSVP for Generic Signaling
AINA '03 Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications
RSVP extensions for real-time services in hierarchical mobile IPv6
Mobile Networks and Applications - Mobile networking through IP
Time-Aware Utility-Based Resource Allocation in Wireless Networks
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
Extending RSVP for Quality of Security Service
IEEE Internet Computing
A cost-efficient method for streaming stored content in a guaranteed QoS internet
Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking
On-board RSVP: an extension of RSVP to support real-time services in on-board IP networks
IWDC'04 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Distributed Computing
RSVP extensions for real-time services in wireless mobile networks
IEEE Communications Magazine
IEEE Communications Magazine
NSIS: a new extensible IP signaling protocol suite
IEEE Communications Magazine
Efficient bandwidth resource allocation for low-delay multiuser video streaming
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Web server support for tiered services
IEEE Network: The Magazine of Global Internetworking
| Hi-index | 0.24 |
In some guaranteed data delivery scenarios, servers can quickly and carefully allocate the available bandwidth among the requests of the users to reduce rejections. This is particularly important when reservations are higher than minimum required delivery rate (semi-elastic reservations). As an example, when semi-elastic reservations utilize all the available server bandwidth and a new flow reservation arrives, it is useful to reallocate current reservations to accept the new one. The RSVP protocol is receiver oriented and it is in charge of setting up these reservations. However, in some cases, to reallocate bandwidth in a receiver oriented way could delay the required sender reservation adjustments. This paper presents a new extension of the RSVP signaling messages that allows the server to adjust and modify these reservations. The performance evaluation of the extended and the native RSVP signaling protocols when used to manage the access bandwidth of a semi elastic flows server shows the benefits of the extensions. In particular, the use of resource reservation is reduced because of a more efficient bandwidth usage. In addition, the blocking probability is also reduced because of a more flexible bandwidth reallocation situation. The authors believe that this procedure is an intermediate step to improve the lack of flexibility that RSVP presents.