Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Trade-Off Manipulations in the Development of Negotiation Decision Support Systems
HICSS '05 Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'05) - Track 1 - Volume 01
Linguistic Bayesian Networks for reasoning with subjective probabilities in forensic statistics
ICAIL '03 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Bayesian networks and traffic accident reconstruction
ICAIL '03 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
The generic/actual argument model of practical reasoning
Decision Support Systems
Knowledge Discovery from Legal Databases
Knowledge Discovery from Legal Databases
Probabilistic Semantics for the Carneades Argument Model Using Bayesian Networks
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
There are many different approaches for settling disputes on-line, such as simple email systems, fixed bid systems and intelligent systems. However, to date there have been no attempts to integrate decision support methods into the dispute resolution process for the purpose of supporting outcomes that are consistent with judicial reasoning. This paper describes how a model of judicial reasoning can be used to assist divorcees with the resolution of property issues online, in a manner that is consistent with decisions a judge would make if the matter was heard in Court. The approach uses an argument based model of the discretionary nature of decisions made by judges in Australian Family Law. This is integrated with a protocol for online dispute dialogue. Predictions of the likelihood of alternates outcomes is achieved with a series of Bayesian Belief Networks.