Fast enumeration algorithms for non-crossing geometric graphs
Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual symposium on Computational geometry
Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications
Discrete Applied Mathematics
On the number of spanning trees a planar graph can have
ESA'10 Proceedings of the 18th annual European conference on Algorithms: Part I
Counting plane graphs with exponential speed-up
Rainbow of computer science
Counting plane graphs: flippability and its applications
WADS'11 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Algorithms and data structures
Counting plane graphs: perfect matchings, spanning cycles, and Kasteleyn's technique
Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual symposium on Computational geometry
Computational geometry column 54
ACM SIGACT News
Counting plane graphs: Perfect matchings, spanning cycles, and Kasteleyn's technique
Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A
Counting plane graphs: cross-graph charging schemes
GD'12 Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Graph Drawing
On numbers of pseudo-triangulations
Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications
A simple aggregative algorithm for counting triangulations of planar point sets and related problems
Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual symposium on Computational geometry
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We investigate the number of plane geometric, i.e., straight-line, graphs, a set S of n points in the plane admits. We show that the number of plane geometric graphs and connected plane geometric graphs as well as the number of cycle-free plane geometric graphs is minimized when S is in convex position. Moreover, these results hold for all these graphs with an arbitrary but fixed number of edges. Consequently, we provide a unified proof that the cardinality of any family of acyclic graphs (for example spanning trees, forests, perfect matchings, spanning paths, and more) is minimized for point sets in convex position. In addition we construct a new maximizing configuration, the so-called double zig-zag chain. Most noteworthy this example bears Θ* $${{(\sqrt{72}\,}^n)}$$ = Θ*(8.4853n) triangulations (omitting polynomial factors), improving the previously known best maximizing examples.