An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system
Communications of the ACM
Evaluation of an inference network-based retrieval model
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) - Special issue on research and development in information retrieval
On Relevance, Probabilistic Indexing and Information Retrieval
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Manipulation of trees in information retrieval
Communications of the ACM
Message Understanding Conference-6: a brief history
COLING '96 Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 1
TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval (Digital Libraries and Electronic Publishing)
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Wittgenstein, Language and Information: "Back to the Rough Ground!" (Information Science and Knowledge Management)
Bias and the limits of pooling
SIGIR '06 Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
Combining structured and unstructured information in a retrieval model for accessing legislation
ICAIL '05 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Making sense of archived e-mail: Exploring the Enron collection with NetLens
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Artificial Intelligence and Law
E-discovery revisited: the need for artificial intelligence beyond information retrieval
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Evaluation of information retrieval for E-discovery
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Lawyers and their large institutional clients increasingly face the enormous problem of how to efficiently and efficaciously conduct searches for relevant documents in large heterogeneous electronic data sets, for the purpose of responding to litigation demands. Past research indicates that lawyers greatly overestimate their true rate of recall in civil discovery. The unprecedented size, scale, and complexity of electronically stored data now potentially subject to routine capture in litigation, for purpose of preservation, access, and review, presents information retrieval researchers with a series of important challenges to overcome. This paper describes the current context of e-discovery and discusses the potential for IR and AI research to address the challenges of conducting e-discovery. The TREC Legal Track is presented as a forum for the evaluation of e-discovery research and one new evaluation measure, elusion, is described, which has potential for addressing problems of measuring recall.