“Implementing packaged software"
Management Information Systems Quarterly
European Journal of Information Systems
A framework for the ex-ante evaluation of ERP software
European Journal of Information Systems - Special issue on information systems evaluation—past, present and future
Valuing Technology: Organisations, Culture, and Change
Valuing Technology: Organisations, Culture, and Change
Software Package Requirements and Procurement
IWSSD '96 Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design
The Business of Software: What Every Manager, Programmer, and Entrepreneur Must Know to Thrive and Survive in Good Times and Bad
Social Learning In Technological Innovation: Experimenting With Information And Communication Technologies
The sociology of a market analysis tool: How industry analysts sort vendors and organize markets
Information and Organization
Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Information and Organization
Artifacts that organize: Delegation in the distributed organization
Information and Organization
A Review of 25 Years of CSCW Research in Healthcare: Contributions, Challenges and Future Agendas
Computer Supported Cooperative Work
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Technology acquisition is an important but neglected issue within the social science analysis of technology. The limited number of studies undertaken reproduce a schism between rationalist (e.g., economic) forms of analysis, where the assumption is that choice is the outcome of formal assessment, and cultural sociological approaches which see choice as driven by the micro-politics of the organisational setting, interests, prevalent rhetorics, fads, etc. While sympathetic to the latter critical view, we are dissatisfied with the relativist portrayal of technology selection: that decisions beset with uncertainties and tensions are divorced from formal decision making criteria. Influenced by Michel Callon's writing on the 'performativity' of economic concepts and tools, we argue that formal assessment has a stronger relationship to technology decisions than suggested by cultural sociologists. We focus on a procurement which is characterised by high levels of organisational tension and where there is deep uncertainty about each of the solutions on offer. We show how the procurement team are able to arrive at a decision through laboriously establishing a 'comparison'. That is, they attempt to drag the choice from the informal domain onto a more formal, accountable plane through the mobilisation and performance of a number of 'comparative measures' and criteria. These measures constituted a stabilised form of accountability, which we describe through the metaphor of a 'scaffolding', erected in the course of the procurement. Our argument is threefold: first, we argue that comparisons are possible but that they require much effort; second, that it is not the properties of the technology which determines choice but the way these properties are given form through the various comparative measures put in place; and finally, whilst comparative measures might be imposed by one group upon others in a procurement team, these measures remain relatively malleable.