The power of images: a discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint
Journal of Documentation
Information resources and democracy: understanding the paradox
Journal of the American Society for Information Science - Special issue: information resources and democracy
The autopoetic state: communication and democratic potential in the net
Journal of the American Society for Information Science - Special issue: information resources and democracy
Information ↔ democracy: an examination of underlying assumptions
Journal of the American Society for Information Science - Special issue: information resources and democracy
Media use and political efficacy: the suburbanization of race and class
Journal of the American Society for Information Science - Special issue: information resources and democracy
Access to information technologies among school-age children: implications for a democratic society
Journal of the American Society for Information Science - Special issue: information resources and democracy
The PEN project in Santa Monica: interactive communication, equality, and political action
Journal of the American Society for Information Science - Special issue: information resources and democracy
The international telephone network and democratization
Journal of the American Society for Information Science - Special issue: information resources and democracy
The use of theory in information science research
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology - Special issue on the still the frontier: Information Science at the Millenium
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Social epistemology and information science
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Despite quantities of popular rhetoric, democratic theory holds an aposiopetic place within library and information science (LIS) in both senses of that word: It is both in a stasis holding to basic ideas outlined 200 years ago and also a silence largely maintained. A review of a number of state-of-the-literature reviews make the case that it has not been systematically explored or applied, and most LIS work elides the questions democratic theory raises. It is time to emend this and account for a relevant intellectual source which can more firmly ground LIS practice and research in normative terms. Toward that end, three productive wellsprings of democratic theory are reviewed: Jürgen Habermas, Sheldon Wolin, and those working on democratic education (Amy Gutmann, Richard Brosio, Maxine Greene). The article concludes with an outline of some possible LIS questions and approaches drawn from these democratic theorists. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.