Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model
SIGGRAPH '87 Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
An optimal solution method for large-scale multiple traveling salesmen problems
Operations Research
Introduction to algorithms
Cyclic transfer algorithms for multivehicle routing and scheduling problems
Operations Research
Cooperation without deliberation: a minimal behavior-based approach to multi-robot teams
Artificial Intelligence - Special issue on Robocop: the first step
An intelligent zone-based delivery scheduling approach
Computers in Industry
Solution of a Min-Max Vehicle Routing Problem
INFORMS Journal on Computing
Continual coordination through shared activities
AAMAS '03 Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
IAT '03 Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology
Coordination without communication: the case of the flocking problem
Discrete Applied Mathematics - Fun with algorithms 2 (FUN 2001)
GECCO '05 Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Some previous studies of the adaptiveness of communication forcoordination have found communication beneficial, others have not.We claim that this results from the lack of a systematicexamination of important variables such as communication range,sensory range, and environmental conditions. We present anextensive series of simulations exploring how these parameterseffect the utility of communication for coordination in themulti-agent territory exploration (MATE( n)) task.MATE(n) requires agents to visit all checkpoints in theenvironment in as little time as possible; n agents must beat a checkpoint simultaneously for it to be counted "visited." Acomparison of the absolute performance of communicating andnon-communicating agents on MATE(n) (i.e., performancewithout regard to cost) finds that communication can be beneficial.A subsequent analysis of the results establishes constraints on thecost of communication for it to provide relative performancebenefit (i.e., absolute performance scaled by cost).