Collaborative information retrieval: toward a social informatics view of IR interaction
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
Structured online interactions: improving the decision-making of small discussion groups
CSCW '00 Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Post-Capitalist Society
A meta-communication model for structuring intercultural communication action patterns
ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin
Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making
Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making
The pragmatic web: a manifesto
Communications of the ACM - Two decades of the language-action perspective
Sensemaking tools for understanding research literatures: Design, implementation and user evaluation
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Acting with genres: discursive-ethical concepts for reflecting on and legitimating genres
European Journal of Information Systems - Special issue: Action in language, organisations and information systems
Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems
Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems
Discovering inconsistency through examination dialogues
IJCAI'05 Proceedings of the 19th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence
An annotation model for making sense of information quality in online video
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Pragmatic Web: Innovating the Interactive Society
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper argues that examination of information in the context of the Pragmatic Web needs to be conducted in a discursive and structured manner. It focuses on examination dialogues and proposes a novel approach to supporting these dialogues in DISCOURSIUM, a tool and methodology for discursive practice based on the meta-communication architecture [29]. To achieve its objective, this paper firstly describes the characteristics of examination dialogues and justifies the relevance of the metacommunication concepts for critically examining information. It secondly illustrates how they can be modeled in the context of the discourse-support system Compendium in order to provide users with templates for examination dialogues. After discussing the limitations of such a modeling, the paper then presents the rationale and methodology of the DISCOURSIUM. It particularly illustrates how DISCOURSIUM can build on the strengths and potential of some current argument mapping technologies, and how the argument maps created can further be critically examined. Finally, this paper concludes that the objective and characteristics of DISCOURSIUM focusing on the pragmatic aspects of information and examination dialogues intersect with the concepts of the Pragmatic Web.