Discussion: Enriching activity theory without shortcuts

Authors:
Yrjö Engeström
Affiliations:
Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research, P.O.Box 26, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
Venue:
Interacting with Computers
Year:
2008

Citing 3
Cited 4

Expansive Visibilization of Work: AnActivity-Theoretical Perspective

Computer Supported Cooperative Work - Special issue: a web on the wind: the structure of invisible work
Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems

Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems
Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution

Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution

Discussion: West meets East: Adapting Activity Theory for HCI & CSCW applications?

Interacting with Computers
Beyond being aware

Information and Organization
Adult self-regulated learning through linking experience in simulated and real world: a holistic approach

EC-TEL'11 Proceedings of the 6th European conference on Technology enhanced learning: towards ubiquitous learning
Evaluating user experience of adaptive digital educational games with Activity Theory

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Attempts to identify an intermediate unit between collective activity and individual action within activity theory are useful and necessary. While several possible conceptualizations have been put forward, engagement is a relevant candidate for naming such a unit. However, the elaboration of such a unit opens up difficult theoretical questions which should not be overlooked. To avoid shortcuts in this endeavor, I discuss four challenges, namely (1) outcomes, not just purposes as the driving force of engagements, (2) dimensions and types of engagements, (3) the linear-temporal and socio-spatial aspects of engagements, and (4) the importance of contradictions, alienation and expansion in the analysis of engagements.