Evaluating system utility and conceptual fit using CASSM

  • Authors:
  • Ann Blandford;Thomas R. G. Green;Dominic Furniss;Stephann Makri

  • Affiliations:
  • UCLIC, University College London, Remax House, 31-32 Alfred Place, London WC1E 7DP, UK;University of Leeds, UK;UCLIC, University College London, Remax House, 31-32 Alfred Place, London WC1E 7DP, UK;UCLIC, University College London, Remax House, 31-32 Alfred Place, London WC1E 7DP, UK

  • Venue:
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

There is a wealth of user-centred evaluation methods (UEMs) to support the analyst in assessing interactive systems. Many of these support detailed aspects of use-for example: is the feedback helpful? Are labels appropriate? Is the task structure optimal? Few UEMs encourage the analyst to step back and consider how well a system supports users' conceptual understandings and system utility. In this paper, we present CASSM, a method, which focuses on the quality of 'fit' between users and an interactive system. We describe the methodology of conducting a CASSM analysis and illustrate the approach with three contrasting worked examples (a robotic arm, a digital library system and a drawing tool) that demonstrate different depths of analysis. We show how CASSM can help identify re-design possibilities to improve system utility. CASSM complements established evaluation methods by focusing on conceptual structures rather than procedures. Prototype tool support for completing a CASSM analysis is provided by Cassata, an open source development.