Adaptive capacities of state IT departments: perceptions of CIOs coping with change

  • Authors:
  • Margaret F. Reid;Cynthia K. Riemenschneider;Myria W. Allen;Deborah J. Armstrong

  • Affiliations:
  • University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR;University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR;University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR;Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL

  • Venue:
  • dg.o '08 Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Digital government research
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to ascertain how state IT departments, specifically Chief Technology or Information Officers (CTOs/CIOs) view changes in their external environment and their departments' ability to adopt and implement new information technologies. The research is based on a recently completed national survey of state IT departments in the US. Employees at three levels in the organization were surveyed: CIOs, managers and employees. This article only focuses on the CIO responses. It contributes to the scant systematic empirical research of state IT departments and their capacities to adapt to and manage technological change. Preliminary findings suggest that CIOs generally perceive their external environments as relatively stable and rich in opportunities. They see their offices as central in the formation, implementation, and evaluation of IT policy and practices throughout their state governments. They perceive their IT employees as actively scanning the external environment for relevant information and as being capable of importing, adapting, and utilizing new technology-related information. Interesting correlations emerged in that CIOs who described their environment as relatively stable and rich in opportunities also indicated their employees were actively engaged in knowledge scanning, their department had a high absorptive capacity, and their office is more central in IT policy formation. Future research will include information regarding the states' economic conditions, strategic and management environment as well as the states' policy innovativeness considering the adoption of various technologies.