Trust and Deception in Mediated Communication
HICSS '03 Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'03) - Track1 - Volume 1
The use of group support systems in focus groups: Information technology meets qualitative research
Computers in Human Behavior
A Comparison of Classification Methods for Predicting Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication
Journal of Management Information Systems
Identification of Comment Authorship in Anonymous Group Support Systems
Journal of Management Information Systems
Computers in Human Behavior
Cultural determinants of media choice for deception
Computers in Human Behavior
The impact of Arab cultural values on online social networking: The case of Facebook
Computers in Human Behavior
Traits, Predictors, and Consequences of Facebook Self-Presentation
Social Science Computer Review
Deception in avatar-mediated virtual environment
Computers in Human Behavior
Online Social Networks: Student Perceptions and Behavior Across Four Countries
International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change
Review: Cross-cultural analysis in online community research: A literature review
Computers in Human Behavior
Computers in Human Behavior
Identifying and Responding to Customer Needs on Facebook Fan Pages
International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Deception research has been primarily studied from a Western perspective, so very little is known regarding how other cultures view deception. Cross-cultural deception research is important due to the escalation of cross-cultural communication. Therefore, this study proposes a framework for understanding the role Korean and American culture plays in deceptive behavior for both face-to-face (FTF) and computer-mediated communication (CMC). The goal of this paper is to test theoretical explanations about the role of culture in deception by the development of a set of hypotheses predicting the conditions under which deception is likely to emerge. A research strategy and construct measures to test the hypotheses are presented. Results from online questionnaires indicated Korean respondents exhibited greater collectivist values, lower levels of power distance, and higher levels of masculine values than Americans. Furthermore, deceptive behavior was greater for FTF communication than for CMC for both Korean and American respondents. In addition to a significant relationship between culture and deception, differences were found between espoused cultural values and deceptive behavior, regardless of national culture. These results indicate the need for future research to consider cultural differences when examining deceptive behavior.