“Combining qualitative and quantitative methods information systems research: a case study"
Management Information Systems Quarterly
Clearing the way for physicians' use of clinical information systems
Communications of the ACM
Power, politics, and MIS implementation
Communications of the ACM
Usability Engineering
Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications
Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Hiding in plain sight: what Koppel et al. tell us about healthcare IT
Journal of Biomedical Informatics - Special section: JAMA commentaries
To err is not entirely human: complex technology and user cognition
Journal of Biomedical Informatics - Special section: JAMA commentaries
Journal of Management Information Systems
Methodological Review: The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Nurses' perceptions and attitudes towards new ADU technology and use
Technology and Health Care
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Primary objective: Much research and practice related to the design and implementation of information technology in health care has been atheoretical. It is argued that using extant theory to develop testable models of health information technology (HIT) benefits both research and practice. Methods and procedures: several theories of motivation, decision making, and technology acceptance are reviewed and associated theory-based principles of HIT usage behaviour are produced. Main outcomes and results: the case of medical error reporting technology is used to support the validity of the proposed HIT usage behaviour principles. Further, combining these principles produces a testable, theoretical multilevel model of HIT usage behaviour. The model provides an alternative to atheoretical research and practice related to HIT. Conclusions: developing, testing, and revising models of HIT like the one presented here is suggested to be beneficial to researchers and practitioners alike.