Personal privacy through understanding and action: five pitfalls for designers
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
Developing privacy guidelines for social location disclosure applications and services
SOUPS '05 Proceedings of the 2005 symposium on Usable privacy and security
End-user privacy in human-computer interaction
Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction
Touch screen user interfaces for older subjects: effect of the targets number and the two hands use
ICCHP'10 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Computers helping people with special needs
Toward active sensor placement for activity recognition
NEHIPISIC'11 Proceeding of 10th WSEAS international conference on electronics, hardware, wireless and optical communications, and 10th WSEAS international conference on signal processing, robotics and automation, and 3rd WSEAS international conference on nanotechnology, and 2nd WSEAS international conference on Plasma-fusion-nuclear physics
Privacy dictionary: a linguistic taxonomy of privacy for content analysis
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Social inclusion through digital engagement
UAHCI'11 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Universal access in human-computer interaction: design for all and eInclusion - Volume Part I
Making family care work: dependence, privacy and remote home monitoring telecare systems
Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Technology aimed at enhancing function and enabling independent living among older and disabled adults is a growing field of research. Privacy concerns are a potential barrier to adoption of such technology. Using data from a national Web survey (n=1,518), we focus on perceived acceptability of sharing information about toileting, taking medications, moving about the home, cognitive ability, driving behavior, and vital signs with five targets: family, healthcare providers, insurance companies, researchers, and government. We also examine acceptability of recording the behaviors using three methods: video with sound, video without sound, and sensors. Results show that sharing or recording information about toileting behavior; sharing information with the government and insurance companies; and recording the information using video were least acceptable. Respondents who reported current disability were significantly more accepting of sharing and recording of information than nondisabled adults, controlling for demographic variables, general technology attitudes, and assistive device use. Results for age were less consistent, although older respondents tended to be more accepting than younger respondents. The study provides empirical evidence from a large national sample of the implicit trade-offs between privacy and the potential for improved health among older and disabled adults in quality of life technology applications.