Proceedings of the the 7th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering
The Journal of Strategic Information Systems
Go (Con)figure: Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams
Organization Science
Sources of errors in distributed development projects: implications for collaborative tools
Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering
Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
"Follow the Sun" Workflow in Global Software Development
Journal of Management Information Systems
Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
To see or not to see: a study comparing four-way avatar, video, and audio conferencing for work
Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Supporting group work
The 24-Hour Knowledge Factory: Work and Organizational Redesign and Associated Challenges
Information Resources Management Journal
The communication patterns of technical leaders: impact on product development team performance
Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
While prior research has found that familiarity is beneficial to team performance, it is not clear whether different kinds of familiarity are more or less beneficial when the work has different types of complexity. In this paper, we theorize how task and team familiarity interact with task and team coordination complexity to influence team performance. We posit that task familiarity is more beneficial with more complex tasks (i.e., tasks that are larger or with more complex structures) and that team familiarity is more beneficial when team coordination is more difficult (i.e., for larger or geographically dispersed teams). Finally, we propose that the effects of task familiarity and team familiarity on team performance are complementary. Based on a field study of geographically distributed software teams, two of our hypotheses are disconfirmed: Our results show that the beneficial effects of task familiarity decline when tasks are more structurally complex and are independent of task size. Conversely, the hypotheses for team familiarity are confirmed as the benefit of team familiarity for team performance is enhanced when team coordination is more challenging---i.e., when teams are larger or geographically dispersed. Finally, surprisingly, we find that task and team familiarity are more substitutive than complementary in their joint effects on team performance: Task familiarity improves team performance more strongly when team familiarity is weak and vice versa. Our study contributes by revealing how different types of familiarity can enhance team performance in a real-world setting where the task and its coordination can be highly complex.