Normative conflict resolution in multi-agent systems

  • Authors:

  • Wamberto W. Vasconcelos;Martin J. Kollingbaum;Timothy J. Norman

  • Affiliations:

  • Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK AB24 3UE;Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA 15213;Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK AB24 3UE

  • Venue:
  • Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
  • Year:
  • 2009

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Norms (permissions, obligations and prohibitions) offer a useful and powerful abstraction with which to capture social constraints in multi-agent systems. Norms should exclude disruptive or antisocial behaviour without prescribing the design of individual agents or restricting their autonomy. An important challenge, however, in the design and management of systems governed by norms is that norms may, at times, conflict with one another; e.g, an action may be simultaneously prohibited and obliged for a particular agent. In such circumstances, agents no longer have the option of complying with these norms; whatever they do or refrain from doing will lead to a social constraint being broken. In this paper, we present mechanisms for the detection and resolution of normative conflicts. These mechanisms, based on first-order unification and constraint solving techniques, are the building blocks of more sophisticated algorithms we present for the management of normative positions, that is, the adoption and removal of permissions, obligations and prohibitions in societies of agents. We capture both direct and indirect conflicts between norms, formalise a practical concept of authority, and model conflicts that may arise as a result of delegation. We are able to formally define classic ways for resolving conflicts such as lex superior and lex posterior.