The Legal Concepts and the Layman's TermsBridging the Gap through Ontology-Based Reasoning about Liability

  • Authors:
  • Ronny van Laarschot;Wouter van Steenbergen;Heiner Stuckenschmidt;Arno R. Lodder;Frank van Harmelen

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Artificial Intelligence, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam;Computer/Law Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam;Department of Artificial Intelligence, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam;Computer/Law Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam;Department of Artificial Intelligence, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2005: The Eighteenth Annual Conference
  • Year:
  • 2005

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The aim of the BEST-project is to support laymen in judging their legal position through intelligent disclosure of case-law in the area of Dutch tort law. A problem we have to face in this context is the discrepancy between the terminology laymen use to describe their case and the terminology found in legal documents. We address this problem by supporting users to describe their case in common sense terms taken from an ontology. We use logical reasoning to automatically determine law articles that are relevant for determining liability of parties in a case based on this description, thus bridging the gap between the laymen's description and the terminology relevant for certain articles that can be found in legal documents. We introduce the BEST-project and describe the ontology built for supporting case descriptions focussing on its use for automatically determining relevant articles of law.