Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals in HYPO
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies - AI and legal reasoning. Part 1
Using Case-Based Reasoning for Argumentation with Multiple Viewpoints
ICCBR '97 Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development
Towards formalising agent argumentation over the viability of human organs for transplantation
MICAI'05 Proceedings of the 4th Mexican international conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Increasing Human-Organ Transplant Availability: Argumentation-Based Agent Deliberation
IEEE Intelligent Systems
Agents Deliberating over Action Proposals Using the ProCLAIM Model
CEEMAS '07 Proceedings of the 5th international Central and Eastern European conference on Multi-Agent Systems and Applications V
A review of current defeasible reasoning implementations
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Applying Preferences to Dialogue Graphs
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
An Argument-Based Approach to Deal with Wastewater Discharges
Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Artificial Intelligence Research and Development
Incorporating a Temporal Bounded Execution to the CBR Methodology
HAIS '09 Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Using CARREL+ to increase availability of human organs for transplantation
IWANN'07 Proceedings of the 9th international work conference on Artificial neural networks
Incorporating temporal-bounded CBR techniques in real-time agents
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Deliberation dialogues for reasoning about safety critical actions
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Case-based strategies for argumentation dialogues in agent societies
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper we present a novel approach for combining Case-Based Reasoning (CBR)Argumentation. This approach involves 1) the use of CBR for evaluating the arguments submitted by agents in collaborative decision making dialogs, and 2) the use of Argument Schemes and Critical Questions to organize the CBR memory space. The former involves use of past cases to resolve conflicts among newly submitted arguments by assigning them a strength, and possibly submitting additional arguments deemed relevant in similar past deliberations. The latter enables use of agents' submitted arguments instantiating Argument Schemes and Critical Questions, to assess the similarity among cases. This use of CBR and argumentation is formulated with the ProCLAIM model, which features a Mediator Agent that directs proponent agents in their deliberation and subsequently evaluates their submitted arguments so as to conclude whether a proposed decision is valid. To motivate and substantiate the practical value of this approach, we illustrate its application in the human organ transplantation field.