Modeling High-Level Cognitive Processes
Modeling High-Level Cognitive Processes
Management of Hospital Teams for Organ Transplants Using Multi-agent Systems
AIME '01 Proceedings of the 8th Conference on AI in Medicine in Europe: Artificial Intelligence Medicine
CBR and Argument Schemes for Collaborative Decision Making
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006
A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action
ArgMAS'04 Proceedings of the First international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Towards formalising agent argumentation over the viability of human organs for transplantation
MICAI'05 Proceedings of the 4th Mexican international conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Agents Deliberating over Action Proposals Using the ProCLAIM Model
CEEMAS '07 Proceedings of the 5th international Central and Eastern European conference on Multi-Agent Systems and Applications V
Applying Preferences to Dialogue Graphs
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Semantics for possibilistic disjunctive programs
LPNMR'07 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Logic programming and nonmonotonic reasoning
Using CARREL+ to increase availability of human organs for transplantation
IWANN'07 Proceedings of the 9th international work conference on Artificial neural networks
Towards characterising argumentation based dialogue in the argument interchange format
ArgMAS'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Argumentation in multi-agent systems
Strategic argumentation in open multi-agent societies
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1
Qualitative Evidence Aggregation using Argumentation
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
Using clinical preferences in argumentation about evidence from clinical trials
Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium
Argumentation about treatment efficacy
KR4HC'09 Proceedings of the 2009 AIME international conference on Knowledge Representation for Health-Care: data, Processes and Guidelines
On a computational argumentation framework for agent societies
ArgMAS'10 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
Deliberation dialogues for reasoning about safety critical actions
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Aggregating evidence about the positive and negative effects of treatments
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Argumentation-logic for creating and explaining medical hypotheses
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Supporting medical discussions through an argumentation-based tool
Proceedings of the Biannual Conference of the Italian Chapter of SIGCHI
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This article is part of a special issue on Intelligent Agents in Healthcare. The shortage of human organs for transplantation is a serious problem, yet the current organ selection and assignment processes discard many organs deemed nonviable for transplantation. However, these processes ignore that medical specialists might disagree as to whether an organ is viable. A novel organ selection process lets transplant physicians, who might be geographically dispersed, deliberate over an organ's viability. This argument-based deliberation is formalized in a multiagent system called Carrel+, which requires the deliberation to adhere to formal rigorous standards acknowledging the domain's safety-critical nature.