Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference
Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference
Do the right thing: studies in limited rationality
Do the right thing: studies in limited rationality
Bucket elimination: a unifying framework for reasoning
Artificial Intelligence
Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems
Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems
Rational Communication in Multi-Agent Environments
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Graphical Models for Game Theory
UAI '01 Proceedings of the 17th Conference in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
Multi-agent algorithms for solving graphical games
Eighteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence
A language for modeling agents' decision making processes in games
AAMAS '03 Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Reasoning about Rationality and Beliefs
AAMAS '04 Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2
Predicting people's bidding behavior in negotiation
AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Extensive games with possibly unaware players
AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Learning social preferences in games
AAAI'04 Proceedings of the 19th national conference on Artifical intelligence
A continuation method for Nash equilibria in structured games
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Multi-agent influence diagrams for representing and solving games
IJCAI'01 Proceedings of the 17th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
Agent-human interactions in the continuous double auction
IJCAI'01 Proceedings of the 17th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
The supply chain trading agent competition
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
History-dependent graphical multiagent models
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1
Representing Bayesian games without a common prior
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 1
Model identification in interactive influence diagrams using mutual information
Web Intelligence and Agent Systems
Learning and predicting dynamic networked behavior with graphical multiagent models
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1
A framework for modeling population strategies by depth of reasoning
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2
Improved use of partial policies for identifying behavioral equivalence
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2
Exploiting model equivalences for solving interactive dynamic influence diagrams
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Learning Communication in Interactive Dynamic Influence Diagrams
WI-IAT '12 Proceedings of the The 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 02
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper presents Networks of Influence Diagrams (NID), a compact, natural and highly expressive language for reasoning about agents' beliefs and decision-making processes. NIDs are graphical structures in which agents' mental models are represented as nodes in a network; a mental model for an agent may itself use descriptions of the mental models of other agents. NIDs are demonstrated by examples, showing how they can be used to describe conflicting and cyclic belief structures, and certain forms of bounded rationality. In an opponent modeling domain, NIDs were able to outperform other computational agents whose strategies were not known in advance. NIDs are equivalent in representation to Bayesian games but they are more compact and structured than this formalism. In particular, the equilibrium definition for NIDs makes an explicit distinction between agents' optimal strategies, and how they actually behave in reality.